Mark Kelly Wasn’t There for Labor When Labor Needed Him

Organized labor is not just a key constituency for the Democratic Party. It is the most powerful force this country has for countering the overwhelming influence—and abusive overreach—of multinational corporations and the billionaire class. Kamala Harris knows this. That’s why she has focused so much of her vice presidency on advancing the cause of labor—traveling the country to meet publicly and privately with union leaders, organizers, and activists in her capacity as chair of the White House Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment. In the administration’s first year, the project yielded more that 70 recommendations—many of which have been implemented—for making it easier for workers to organize and engage in collective bargaining. In the summer of 2022, she told me in an interview, “This is the beginning of the next era of the labor movement.”

Given Harris’s longtime support of workers’ rights, unions were quick to endorse her bid for the presidency. That enthusiasm was on display Wednesday night, when thousands of union members participated in a nationwide Labor for Harris Organizing Call. “We have walked the walk with her,” declared Randi Weingarten, the president of the 1.7-million-member American Federation of Teachers, who said that Harris’s candidacy “has riveted my members in the last week or two.”

The next big test for Harris will be her selection of a vice-presidential running-mate. Most of the potential picks are labor stalwarts. But one possible VP pick, Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, has a record that has raised concerns among union leaders and members. Of particular concern has been Kelly’s reluctance—until very recently—to embrace labor’s top legislative priority, the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. 

After the Democrats took charge of the White House and both chambers of Congress in January 2021, lawmakers introduced the PRO Act in an effort to expand union power. The measure is a sweeping plan to remove barriers to organizing workplaces across the country, and to make it possible for labor and national unions to bargain equitable contracts. The AFL-CIO describes the PRO Act, which is ardently backed by union activists and by Biden and Harris, as “the most significant worker empowerment legislation since the Great Depression.” Predictably, it is opposed by corporate interests and their congressional allies.

In March 2021, the PRO Act passed the House with bipartisan support, in a 225-206 vote that then-AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka described as “a game-changer”  for working Americans. “If you really want to correct inequality in this country — wages and wealth inequality, opportunity and inequality of power — passing the PRO Act is absolutely essential to doing that,” said Trumka in 2021, when he urged the Senate, where Democrats had a narrow advantage, to advance the legislation to President Biden’s desk.

The Senate failed to do so because, in addition to overwhelming Republican opposition, a handful of Senate Democratic Caucus members were reluctant to sign on for the measure, including West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, Maine’s Angus King, Virginia’s Mark Warner, and the two senators from Arizona, Kyrsten Sinema and Kelly. In the face a major campaign led by the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (IUPAT) and other unions, Manchin and King joined the vast majority of Senate Democrats as co-sponsors in April 2021, bringing the number of co-sponsors to 47. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the chamber would bring the measure to a vote if 50 Democrats agreed to co-sponsor it. Strategizing began for efforts to break an anticipated Republican filibuster in order to pass the bill.

Kelly was seen as the key senator to make it all happen. If he moved, the argument went, Sinema could be convinced to do the same. And if they both signed on, a massive AFL-CIO push was planned in order to get Warner on board. But Kelly never moved, assuring that the measure would, in the words of the Revolving Door Project “stagnate in the Senate.” 

After Trumka’s death in the summer of 2021, the legislation was renamed in the longtime AFL-CIO leader’s honor. But still it was stalled, through the 117th Congress and into the 118th. Henry Burke, a senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project, noted last month, just two days after Biden decided to stand down as the Democratic candidate for president and hand the mantle to Harris, “While Kelly has hinted that he may be open to considering some provisions of the PRO Act, two years later, he remains one of only two Senate Democrats not cosponsoring the legislation.”

That was a consequential observation since Kelly’s name had by then surfaced as a leading prospect to join Harris as her vice-presidential running mate on the ticket of a party that will need enthusiastic support from unions and their members this fall. Harris is garnering that support, winning strong endorsements from the AFL-CIO and major unions such as the Service Employees International Union, the United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Laborers International Union of North America, the United Steelworkers, and the United Auto Workers. These unions know Harris, they know her record, and they are enthusiastic about her candidacy—as was obvious when the vice president received a rapturous response when she appeared last week at the Houston convention of the American Federation of Teachers, which was one of the first unions to endorse her.

But there have been questions about Kelly. Last week, when TV networks began reporting on the senator’s failure to co-sponsor the PRO Act, Transport Workers Union President John Samuelsen, a key player on the national labor scene, asked ABC News, “Why would the Democrats even consider a senator for the vice presidency if he doesn’t support the PRO Act?” An unnamed union president told ABC, “The Democrats cannot have someone on the ticket who is identified as soft on labor. This is a huge problem.”