NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
So The New York Times now claims that even this new so-called “positive masculinity” of progressive men sucks, too. The article was written by feminist Ruth Whippman. Perfect name if you ask me. I think Sarah Ballcrusher was taken. Thanks to this, we can forget about toxic masculinity. Even positive masculinity is a problem now. “After the cartoonish supervillainism of Donald Trump and the sad misogyny of JD Vance, the positive masculinity of Walz and his ilk come as a welcome relief. But for the next generation of boys, maybe it's better if we abandon the rhetoric about masculinity altogether.” I know.
He adds: “The idea that boys must use masculinity as a fixed reference point for their self-worth is harmful to themselves and others.” Never mind, lady. But look, what do you expect from a mindset that thinks women can wear a 5:00 shade and then mocks women who want to be good wives and mothers? They can't define women anymore, so what the hell do they know about men?
KAMLA HARRIS'S HUSBAND, DOUG EMHOFF, 'CHANGED THE PERCEPTION OF MASCULINITY': MSNBC HOST
Unfortunately, the left's only real masculinity these days comes from its admirals. But look, having a liberal feminist write about masculinity is like reviewing a vegan book called Outback Steakhouse. She'll make everyone in this place miserable, and she can't be trusted with a knife. But it's funny that after 300,000 years of functional biology, which has had both male and female organisms in just the last few decades, we have insightful experts who have decided it's all wrong. What an upside down face. He's no different than Howard Stern.
I mean, I'm talking about transition. On Tuesday, he interviewed Kamala Harris and it was so playful and feminine that I got my period while listening to it. You should hear what's keeping him up at night.
HOWARD STERN: This is what keeps me up at night. I don't understand like my fellow Americans. I don't even understand how these elections are close. And yes, I'm voting for you, but I'd also vote for that wall.
Well, he's half right. We do need a wall to keep out gang members, fentanyl dealers, human traffickers and… Ana Navarro. The funny thing, though, is that Stern actually took it as a compliment. Stern has become such a pompous sycophant that he doesn't realize that telling Kamala he voted for the wall means he knows she's stupid like him. That is, not to mention that Trump is a wall candidate, not Cackles McKneepads. Stern became even more pathetic, wondering how he wasn't napping.
HOWARD STERN: I understand you're not sleeping. Because what you have undertaken is extremely difficult. And I mean, do you feel the pressure of the moment in the sense that like when I met you in the hallway, I said, I'm really nervous because I want everything to go well for you. I want it to go well for the country.
HOWARD STERN SAYS HE 'HATES' EVERYONE WHO VOTES FOR Trump: 'THEY ARE STUPID, I HAVE NO CHANCE FOR THEM'
Hold on. I need a minute.
Okay, we're back. Remember that Stern threw pieces of crap at the butts of strippers. I would add that with precision. Now he's worried that the potential leader of the free world won't be able to handle his verbal foot rubs. I wonder if he was that nervous about the strippers before he spanked their bare butts with a dead fish. Here's Stern for anyone who dares to make fun of Kamala.
HOWARD STERN: Even when I watched them on Saturday Night Live with… Where Maya Rudolph Plays With You. I hate it. I don't want you ridiculed. I… there's too much at stake. I now believe in the entire future of this country. I mean America, the land of the free, the home of the brave, I think it's literally in danger.
So the guy who was supposed to make a living says her candidacy is too important to joke about. This is the guy who once joked right after the Columbine massacre that the killers should have raped the students before they killed them. Not that I like it, Stern, but that swing from saying the most unsavory thing in the world to putting eggs in the tick box – you have to wonder what's going on here. What's striking is that the king of the most misogynistic humor of all time now turns into a breathtaking asshole over a progressive, hopelessly shallow candidate. But maybe that's the explanation.
This is Stern's self-imposed penance for subjecting women to demoralizing acrobatics, taking advantage of desperate women hungry for attention, even if it comes from a greasy paddle slapping their naked butts. TRUE, most of Stern's transformation is based mainly on a delusional hatred of Trump, but it also flows from a bottomless hatred of himself and his past. And he has projected his hatred onto Trump, which earns praise from his Hamptons neighbors and new pal Jimmy Kimmel, who is also atone for his past sins.
But is Howard simply redefining masculinity? And why are male leftists always so desperate to get rid of their masculinity completely? It's a feeling of guilt and a desire for self-preservation. Because scratch beneath the surface of any liberal man and what do you discover? Blood. Terrified of his conceited past. Pig past. I mean, not primitive. What is primitive? And this fear makes them obedient advocates for a completely unqualified candidate.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
They desperately give up on logic and reason. And with it all traces of masculinity. So, Howard, you've been in therapy for what, 50 years? And it was in one monologue that I diagnosed your problem. Don't worry. The first visit is free.