Does Boris Johnson have a newfound respect for women? Let's listen to what he calls 'Grumpy Old Knickers' | Catherine Bennett

WThe omen cannot – of course – be curious to know how after his well-documented career. Sexual incontinence, Boris Johnson managed to weave this awful story UnleashedMostly his parallel preoccupations are politics and a memoir that his publishers describe as “ugly”.

Will there be some tribute, at any rate, to the young women he forced to share the burden of his narcissism with a second Mrs. Johnson and their children while on some important work? At least eight of these girls were conceived by Johnson's father, whose personal commitment to population growth remains, the book's essential notes on family life, a mystery. The only girlfriend featured is “Carrie,” the third Mrs. Johnson, who unexpectedly appears as the heir apparent in a memoir with incongruous details (Damien Lewis's “brother was in my rugby team”). To “Marina”, he vaguely identified himself as “my wife in 2016”.

Two years after resigning over Brexit, the prolific conceptionist, the Uxbridge and South Ruislip MP, can now be seen enjoying a “wilderness” period with the man who holds the key to her heart. “I led a kind of mountain life, barbecuing with Gary by the pool in Thame, sitting in my shorts, drinking beer and shooting champagne bottles with my airguns,” he writes. (Future posterity, unfamiliar with that intramural romance, might benefit from additional notes that Carrie is not. James Middleton's spaniel, a prized companion animal.)

Not for the first time, Johnson has invited us to film him in short films, saying that people with body dysmorphia don't consider themselves submissive. It could be the opposite. From the perspective of his unusual, triangular eyes, he offers this analysis of Theresa May's nostrils: “Huge long and pointed black tadpole shapes like a Gerald Scarfe cartoon.” Much to the prime minister's dismay, his scientific advisers were, first, “bald and etiolated”. Outright insults are no less a source of author pride. Maybe it's some sort of Oxford classic thing? Starmer is a bull, bollard, traffic cone; Lady Hale “Spiderwoman”; May, “Grumpy Old Knickers”.

I think Johnson's supporters might argue that their hero is practically daring to encourage people to despise him, and instead, a status-eating Fatberg, whose complete removal is the only way to save the political system he recently polluted from permanent ethical doom.

The challenge for anyone seeking to protect England from Johnson's comeback is a considerable one to prevent this grandiose sanitized self-hagiography from contributing to the resurgence. Supplied by Jesse Norman FTOnly the latest writer to consider his old friend's scheme borrowed from Churchill: “History will be dear to me because I want to write it.”

Long before Johnson released his campaign epic, the government's Hannah White predicted with near-perfect accuracy what would be key to Johnson's Churchill-style, “rose-tinted” account: his 80-seat majority, his vaccine victory, his savior Ukraine. Likewise, he pointed out some major flaws that would render his version of history absolutely worthless, ranging from his ethical vapidity and skill removal, to confusion and contempt for expert institutions, including the Supreme Court and the Commons Privileges Committee. 2023 home concluded that he lied. Treasured, the habitual liar (as Mumsnet once hailed him) complains Unleashed About being lied to by others. “I believed so much.”

Avoid past newsletter advertising

This is not to say that every page is intentionally misleading. Some recycled columns. If readers can easily, what with all the self-serving flaws, come away with a false impression, it's probably, as Johnson always said, someone else's fault. Also, his childhood successes may be greater than the diminutive honors or long relationships with him. Petronella Wyatt and Jennifer Arcuri. During his Eton years, his authority is unquestioned: “They call me a college student, because I live in a special super-sweat hothouse called a college.” Likewise, there is no doubt that the gluttony made Johnson's promotion to Secretary of State so remarkable. With status and borrowed luxury (the painful loss of which surely warrants a comeback attempt), Johnson falls for Grubb: “Splendid and glamorous banquets, one upon another: full English breakfasts, lunch and dinner and wine with beer, late-night canapés and the best. Tea – fruit cake, scones with jam and cream and always freshly cut three kinds of sandwiches (ham, cheese, cucumber)….”

Chief among his various attempts to represent himself as better than a wine-soaked punter is the episode “Teach Her to Read.” From this, Johnson and future readers with no background knowledge of women (e.g., his “totty” and “wet otter” pleasures, recalling his hand on her thigh refusing his respectable journalist) could easily conclude that the seriousness of women's education reflected a genuine desire for female advancement. can do

In the same book, Johnson makes fun of old women, belittles the misogyny of Saudi Arabia and forgets his gender toxicity as he calls a young EU official “fragrant”: his “messianic” hopes for women's literacy must be understood. He is now backtracking on his lifelong ambition. “Elevate the sexes,” he writes. “Raise the world.”

Thanks to Lady Hallett's covid inquiry, we know that Johnson's passion for female empowerment coincided with misogyny in 2020. Attached is a message from his former protégé, Dominic Cummings. “That woman should be without our hair,” Cummings wrote of a senior female civil servant. “We cannot continue to deal with this appalling decay of the British state and at the same time keep the stilettos out of that trap.” There is zero evidence that Boris Johnson has changed since he received it without opposition Unleashed.

Catherine Bennett is a Visitor columnist