Dysfunctional Los Angeles City Politics Threatens Housing Progress

When Karen Bass was elected mayor of Los Angeles, it seemed that the city’s shameful neglect of its housing crisis would finally end. Bass, after all, is a progressive, and she staked much of her political capital during her mayoral campaign on a pledge to tackle the interconnected crises of homelessness and a dearth of affordable or supportive housing in the sprawling city.

Two years on, the promise is unfulfilled, and what progress has been made, through Bass-backed programs such as Inside Safe, which has moved thousands of people from the streets into motels, is now at risk of being reversed, according to advocates who have argued in court that city officials are using their clout to block new housing developments in affluent parts of town. Becky Dennison, co–executive director of the Venice Community Housing Corporation, told me in a recent conversation that different city agencies and officials are at war with each other over how to tackle the housing crisis and whether to share the burden equitably across neighborhoods. “There’s no unified message coming out of the city; it’s complete uncertainty. It creates a situation in which everybody loses.”

True, on-the-streets homeless numbers have declined for the first time since the start of the Covid pandemic, at least in part because of Bass’s efforts on the issue. But the declines are small (just over 2 percent in 2024), and upwards of 45,000 people continue to live on the sidewalks of Los Angeles, with tens of thousands more in the surrounding county.

When Los Angelenos are polled, by huge margins they report that housing and homelessness are their top local concerns, and large majorities of residents favor the city and state’s being more involved in developing affordable housing in the region. Two-thirds of residents also want more rental units in their neighborhoods. Yet progress is being stifled by an unsavory coalition of developers and affluent homeowners, who have sought to prevent affordable housing from being constructed in wealthier parts of town.

Karen Bass’s much-touted Executive Directive 1, which was aimed at fast-tracking affordable housing projects around the city, has been watered down to the point of absurdity. Under pressure from homeowners, especially on the wealthy West Side and in glitzier enclaves of the San Fernando Valley, Bass had the directive rewritten to exclude residential neighborhoods zoned exclusively for single-family housing. This change automatically excluded roughly three-quarters of the city, including most of its affluent, politically influential neighborhoods, from having to meet affordable-housing and supportive-housing targets. Those areas that weren’t excluded were poorer, and less white; thus, poverty and services for the unhoused remain concentrated in already-struggling communities.

Arguably, nowhere has the promise fallen shorter than in Venice, a picturesque beach community that has seen an explosion in homelessness and encampments in recent years. As I reported in 2021, homes along the canals in Venice can cost millions of dollars; meanwhile, a year into the pandemic, thousands were sleeping in tents along the boardwalk and in back alleys and parking lots.

In the years since, many of the encampments have been swept, and more will likely be dismantled in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling allowing cities to shut down encampments, and under Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order urging cities to do just that. But Venice’s affordable-housing crisis remains as acute as ever.

Dennison’s group hopes to break ground on a 140-unit supportive housing development—one of eight city-owned lots identified, back in 2016, as being suitable for such projects—in early 2026. It is known as the Venice Dell supportive housing development, and was conceived as part of a larger, coordinated effort to tackle the community’s housing crisis. So far, however, it is more a dream than a reality.

In a sign of how dysfunctional Los Angeles city politics around housing continues to be, city agencies, urged on by affordable-housing advocates, recently fought two lawsuits, brought by NIMBYist community groups opposed to the project. The city won the lawsuits, tamed the NIMBYists, and for a while it looked as if the project would proceed as planned. Meanwhile, however, council member Traci Park and the City Attorney’s office under Hydee Feldstein Soto quietly launched their own rearguard action to stonewall the project, exerting pressure on the Departments of City Planning and of Transportation to withhold vital notices of clarification from the Coastal Commission, without which the commission cannot issue the final permits needed for development projects near the ocean to get underway. Those documents have been on ice for over a year now, resulting in a Fair Housing lawsuit being filed against the city last month, and an investigation being launched by the state’s Housing Accountability Unit.

In other words, taxpayer dollars were recently spent to allow the city to fight in the courts in favor of the affordable-housing development. Now, additional taxpayer dollars will be spent allowing the city to defend itself in court against allegations that it is illegally opposing that very same development. That isn’t just dysfunctional; it’s absurd.